This is an old check from 1997 used to pay Bill's communist lawyer, who threatens to sue the people of Camden for speaking out against the Sheriff.
So what gives? Why did he get another signature back then and not today?
Click on pic to enlarge:

"The people of this County do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created." ***The views expressed on this blog are the opinions of the individual that wrote them.
10 comments:
Look closely: the second signature is that of "C.A. Easterling."
Rather like Adolf Eichman co-signing with Adolf Hitler.
Your right Jay, He still gets two signatures on the checks. The second signature comes from his office from Wanda, Charlie, Wesley, or Edna. Do you think any one of them would say NO, I am not going to sign it??
I believe the second signature from Willie's on office would be equated to "the fox watching the hen house"????
If the check was for Smith's lawyer, what was it for?
Hell, they've long since eaten all of the hens. They've long since moved on to catered coc au vin - at no cost to the taxpayers!
The second signature is supposed to be a Camden County Commissioner, not one of his employees. I'm sure the Feds don't know who the Commissioners are in this County. As far as Bill is concerned he got a second signature and thats all he needed, who cares who's signature it is after all. LOL
This Check is where the GBI Investigated the Sheriff Smith and he wanted the citizens of Camden County to pay his legal bills and the Georgia House of Representatives said NO by a House Vote of 24 Yeas to119 Nays.
So what did Our Great Sheriff do? He when straight to the seized asset account and wrote out a check for $65,000.00 and had his honest Chief deputy Charlie Easterling sign it and paid off his High Dollar Atlanta Lawyer with it.
Here is the link of the Georgia House of Representatives.
http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/1995_96/leg/fulltext/hr1036.htm
More Reading from above post:
Cut and past the link for the rest of the story.
IN RE WILLIAM E. SMITH, SHERIFF.
Docket number: A93A0021
DECIDED
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/20437746
I wonder how the federal govt approved to use drug money to pay for his legal defense for a criminal act? This is odd, I can not understand how this falls under the guidelines of asset seizures. Strange
The payment does not fall under the guidelines and if the feds would have so advised BTW if they had been contacted.
Not strange, just malfeasance.
Post a Comment