" ....Smith believes that education is essential to success. "Having these Scholarships, which were approved by Atty. General Janet Reno, available to local students makes achieving that success much easier," he said. ....."
But this can't be the truth either, for two reasons:
First, these scholarships were started in 2002; Janet Reno was not in office in 2002.
Second and more importantly, I have a piece of paper signed by Sheriff Smith that states he never used the seized assets outside the guidelines. So, who is not telling the truth?
Smith or Terrell?
Also, in reference to Grant Porter’s letter Fry’s letter spread untruths about Smith. He states that “the county clerk and the finance department cannot produce one letter requesting the expenditures.” That part I hope was referring to Berry, because I am sure they can produce my email, Terrell can show you the same email. It asks for those same records, and here was their response dated June 17, 2007 via email:
“We can provide you with an expenditures report from July 2007 through November 2007. After November 2007, the CCSO was given monthly allotments (less the payroll expenses) to manage, and we have not received an accounting of those allotments as of yet.”
“We can provide you with an expenditures report from July 2007 through November 2007. After November 2007, the CCSO was given monthly allotments (less the payroll expenses) to manage, and we have not received an accounting of those allotments as of yet.”
You be the judge!!!
3 comments:
So they still claim that they follow the federal guidelines. But the feds had to tell them to stop paying inmates? Right...guidelines followed!
Also, these scholarships that were offered to local students, were those advertised so everyone had an equal opportunity to apply? I know, it's who you know!!!
Rick..you and Jay keep up all the good work you've been doing. Thank you very much.
the program began with the trusty's going to college. grant porter has no room to talk, he is not a certified officer, but BTW paid for his nursing license. most of the office bimbos should not have had any money spent on them either, unless they are certified officers. the rules say law enforcement personnel, not law enforcement secretaries and administrative staff. the rules are specific and have been violated over and over again. if you twist a rule or law until it meets your needs, then what good is it to begin with?
Post a Comment